Cogitan
← All surrogates

Fluxus-Q

Served

Resonator frequency

The resonant frequency of a coplanar-waveguide readout resonator, from its layout geometry, with a fractional error band on every answer.

For: Readout-resonator designers who would otherwise run an eigenmode solve to place each resonator frequency.

0.48%

median error vs HFSS, claw given

1.09% p95 · grouped split · n = 1,160

Status. Served on the hosted Fluxus API.

Engine. Data-trained surrogate of an electromagnetic eigenmode solve.

Reference. SQuADDS HFSS eigenmode simulations — electromagnetic simulation, not measured silicon.

API

Endpoints

POST/v1/fluxus/resonator

one resonator → frequency and error band

Base URL https://api.cogitan.ai, bearer key from an approved account. Read GET /v1/fluxus/capabilities first: it states the same fidelity, validation, envelope and refusal conditions as this page. Access model.

Inputs

What you send

length_um
µm — total resonator length
kind
lambda4 | lambda2 — quarter- or half-wave
center_width_um
µm — CPW centre-conductor width
gap_um
µm — CPW gap
coupling_length_um
µm — optional; defaults to the trained value for the kind
claw_length_um
µm — optional; supplying it selects the claw-aware model

Outputs

What comes back

fr_ghz
GHz — predicted resonator frequency
rel_interval
fractional error band: the measured held-out p95, constant across inputs
source
engine identity
model_variant
which of the two models answered (claw-aware or claw-blind)

Validation

Measured against what, and how

Reference. SQuADDS HFSS eigenmode simulations — electromagnetic simulation, not measured silicon.

Sample. 1,160 simulated resonators over 19 distinct lengths.

Split. Grouped 5-fold cross-validation holding out whole resonator lengths, so every test resonator has a length the model never saw.

Claw length given

0.48% median

1.09% p95

Claw length not given

2.73% median

10.52% p95

Analytic CPW model (baseline)

20.03% median

what the surrogate replaced

Error-band coverage

0.983

constant band, 95% target

Envelope

Where the answer is trusted

λ/4 length
2,700 – 4,700 µm
λ/4 coupling length
100 – 500 µm
λ/2 length
2,700 – 8,700 µm
λ/2 coupling length
0 only
center_width_um
11.7 µm (fixed)
gap_um
5.1 µm (fixed)
claw_length_um
70 – 577.5 µm

Refusals

When you get no number

  • Any input outside the envelope returns HTTP 422 with code resonator_outside_envelope, naming the field, the value received and the allowed range, so the call can be repaired and retried.
  • The cross-section is pinned because the reference data holds it at one value. Answering off it was measured at 39% from HFSS — worse than the analytic formula — so it refuses instead.

Known limits

What it does not do

  • Without the claw length the model is a scoping tool: 2.73% median and 10.52% p95 is not enough to place a readout frequency. Supply the claw length when you know it.
  • The error band is a single constant (the measured p95), not a per-point interval. Per-point intervals were built and rejected on measurement: they covered less (0.893 against the 95% target) and were wider.
  • Only the CPW cross-section in the reference data is covered. A different centre width or gap is outside the envelope, however close.

Where something else wins

  • Outside the envelope the analytic CPW formula is the right tool, and the surrogate says so by refusing rather than extrapolating.

Corrected 2026-10-02

  • Until 2026-10-02 the endpoint did not check resonator length, and the envelope was applied as if λ/2 and λ/4 shared one. Default λ/2 requests were answered 13–25% high, outside the band served with them. The envelope is now per kind and the defaults are kind-aware.

Every figure on this page compares against a simulator or a published device measurement. None of it is a prediction of your fabricated hardware. For one certification-grade answer, run the full reference; this is for screening many designs cheaply and spending solver time on the survivors.